|
|
 |
Intelligent Design: Yes! No!
10 August 2005
Today, 9 am eastern time: C-Span's "Washington Journal" debates "Intelligent Design." For: some activist. Against: some other activist. Our point: Why do advocates of ID -- who insist that ID is good science -- put forth activists as spokespeople rather than scientists? And why do opponents of ID -- who insist that ID is bad science -- put forth activists rather than scientists? Because ID isn't about science, it's about rhetorical power in the public sphere.
|
|
|
